Warner Smith
  • Warner Smith
  • Sermons
  • Daily Devotions
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
Follow

Posts tagged Biblical Truth

Being a Christian Does Not Mean You Will Never Have Any Problems

Apr29
2012
Written by Warner Smith

When I was in high school I entered the Public Speaking Contest each year.  My classmates had the unfortunate duty of having to listen to me practice my speeches as the contest dates approached.  Many of them may remember the introductory line of one of those speeches.

“Problems, problems, problems! You got problems, I’ve got problems, everybody’s got problems.”

It was true then and it is true now, and will remain true into the future.

For some reason many people mistakenly believe that when they receive Christ as their personal savior they will never ever experience anymore problems in their lives.  This is not reality.  There are up and downs in our relationship with God, and this is normal.

The Psalmist’s reveal how normal individual ups and downs in ones relationship with God can be.  The various writers of the Psalms reveal an open, honest relationship with God warts and all.

The Psalmist expressed anger to God due to his feelings of abandonment.

9 I say to God my Rock, ‘‘Why have you forgotten me? Why must I go about mourning, oppressed by the enemy?” 10 My bones suffer mortal agony as my foes taunt me, saying to me all day long, ‘‘Where is your God?” Psalm 42:9-10

Because God’s timing is not our own we often feel as though he has abandoned us. Hindsight will reveal how wrong our feelings of abandonment truly are, but this does not change how we feel in those moments of pain.When you feel as though God has abandoned you tell Him!  He can handle our anger, our questions, and even our rage.  Crying out to Him in our desperation is how children respond to their father when they are in distress.  These expressions are a biblical form of prayer known as prayer’s of complaint. The key is to complain to Him and not everyone else.

The footprints poem helps us understand how Christ really helps us get through our own times of trouble and pain.

Footprints in the Sand

One night I dreamed I was walking along the beach with the Lord. Many scenes from my life flashed across the sky. In each scene I noticed footprints in the sand. Sometimes there were two sets of footprints, other times there was one only. This bothered me because I noticed that during the low periods of my life, when I was suffering from anguish, sorrow or defeat, I could see only one set of footprints, so I said to the Lord, “You promised me Lord, that if I followed you, you would walk with me always. But I have noticed that during the most trying periods of my life there has only been one set of footprints in the sand. Why, when I needed you most, have you not been there for me?” The Lord replied, “The years when you have seen only one set of footprints, my child, is when I carried you.” – Mary Stevenson, 1936

Remember if you are His, not only does He have you in His hand when your problems seem unbearable He is carrying you.  If your problems seem more than you can bear ignore conventional wisdom.  Don’t tie a knot and hang on. Bend your knees and bow your heart and if God is you Father (i.e. you have established a relationship with him by placing your faith in His son) then cry out to Him.  Express yourself to Him openly, honestly and candidly! You will feel better, and more than any earthly father God can and will respond when He hears His children cry.

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Encouragement

Book Review: The Doctrine of Repentance

Apr29
2012
Written by Warner Smith

In the Doctrine of Repentance 1 Thomas Watson goes to great lengths to impress upon his reader the basis of his thesis that both the gravity of sin and the blessings of repentance dictate that all men everywhere repent at once. He presents his arguments, against sin and in favor of repentance, by attempting to overcome every possible objection his audience might raise with a thoroughness that would cause his audience to flee their sin and run to God pleading for His many mercies. While initially directed to the Christians of seventeenth-century England, this discourse has great application for Christians of every age.

The last two chapters provide a good summary for the entire book. Watson wants the reader to give serious consideration to what sin is (106-113) and to the ramifications of neglecting God’s offer of grace (114-118), while he also entices the reader to make a realistic comparison between the impenitent person and the penitent one (119-122).

Watson warns his reader against counterfeit repentance (15-17) by listing three common deceits. First, he states that one may experience the terror of conviction for their sin without turning from their sin. Second, he points out that some make deals with God in hopes of averting either some present painful situation or a perceived future circumstance in Hell. Thirdly, he warns that others may reform significant portions of their life but not all, thereby simply exchanging one sin for another.

Next, Watson gives his reader the six ingredients of repentance. Repentance, according to Watson, is made up of sight of sin, sorrow for sin, confession of sin, shame of sin, hatred for sin, and turning from sin. Following this, he moves to commending repentance to his reader by using both negative and positive means as he lists the various reasons that enforce repentance and warnings to the unrepentant. Subsequently, he turns his attention to two branches of exhortation designed to motivate repentance. Watson then shows the various comforts repentance offers the penitent and ten common obstacles that prevent true repentance.

One example of the thoroughness of Watson’s approach can be seen in his treatment of ten reasons repentance is necessary for Christians. In this section he points out that true Christians must understand repentance to be a continuous act and not merely a one-time occurrence. The whole of our lives must be lived repentantly.

The reader finds a treasure in Watson’s discussion of true repentance which will assist in providing a possible explanation for the common question of why bad things happen to good people while those who do not live for God seem unaffected by life’s tragedies is found. He writes,

That sin is worse than affliction is evident because the greatest judgement God lays upon man in this life is to let him sin without control. When the Lord’s displeasure is most severely kindled against a person, he does not say, I will bring the sword and the plague upon this man, but, I will let him sin on . . . if the giving up of a man to his sins is the most dreadful evil, then sin is far worse than affliction (50).

A primary strength of this book is its practicality. In his thoroughness Watson provides answers for almost all the questions one might have about his own repentance. One such example is the aforementioned discussion of his ten reasons repentance is necessary for every Christian. Another example of this practicality that makes this book important for Christians to read is Watson’s treatment of the confession of sin (28- 36). By focusing on various qualifications that need to be present in one’s confession and the focus on four types of people who make faulty confessions, Watson helps Christians examine their own hearts and determine the reality of their own confessions. Watson provides a balanced treatment of the effects of one’s confession on God as well as on the individual. This methodical approach is very helpful, particularly when understood in light of his first qualification, that “confession must be voluntary” (29). This qualification is a blow thrown against the current perception of Puritans as being overbearing and doctrinaire in their approach to the individual.

A second strength of this work for Christians is the focus Watson gives to the nature and effect of our sins. In his answer of the question “What is there in sin that may make a penitent hate it?”, he gives “a fourfold conceit” (48). Watson states that a person who has truly been repentant will come to hate sin because: sin comes from hell, sin’s nature will appear dishonoring to God, sin appears appalling in its comparison to holiness, and sin’s consequences on one’s own body and soul are abhorrent (48-51). This list is very helpful for those trying to reach secular people today, particularly in its balance between the slight sinners give a holy God and the effects sin has on the individual. Again, this balance is not what one expects from a Puritan writer based on their contemporary reputation.

A third strength of this book that has great importance for readers today is the emphasis Watson places on his argument that there is no such thing as a carnal Christian. He writes, “It is inconsistent with the sanctity of God’s nature to pardon a sinner while he is in the act of rebellion” (60). He suggests that when people half turn from sin “in their judgement but not in their practice” (56), the result is a life that “may be moralized [but] the lust [is] unmortified” (67). Watson uses the story of the evil spirit that leaves a man, but then says he will return to the house he left, and finding it cleaned and organized, the evil spirit brings seven other spirits with him so that the latter end is worse than the former (Luke 11:24-26) to explain the dangers this failure to truly repent harbors. This concept of the failure of persons to be completely repentant gives a cogent explanation as to why so many church members are powerless in their personal lives and why so many churches are not having greater impact upon their surrounding communities.

One weakness that this work contains is Watson’s potential to overstate his argument. He equates shame for sin with blushing. Any outward appearance cannot be expected to completely and accurately reflect the inner reality within an individual’s heart. While shame for sin is important, and missing in too many today, it is an overstatement to say that “If Christ’s blood were not at the sinner’s heart, there would not so much blood come to the face”(39).

Another example of this tendency to overstate is the possible impression that its focus on tears could make on some as a necessary work in legitimizing their repentance. There are statements in which Watson appears to make the tears of repentance meritorious. Watson does list in two paragraphs “a necessary caution” (96) in which he writes “I grant repenting tears are precious . . . but yet, tears are not satisfactory for sin . . . Christ’s blood only can merit pardon. . . to trust in our repentance is to make it a saviour” (96). In spite of this disclaimer, however, there are many more instances in which Watson gives emphasis throughout his work to the importance of tears in repentance. In his conclusion of his ingredients of repentance he writes, “God would rather have our repenting tears than our blood” (58). One of his powerful motives to excite repentance is that “repenting tears are delicious” (77), and then he states that “Mary Magdalene . . . obtained pardon when she washed Christ’s feet with her tears”(78). He continues this idea by stating that “never do the flowers of grace grow more than after a shower of repenting tears” (79), and this is closely followed by the suggestion that “when we put the water of tears into God’s bottle, this fetches up wine”(80). He suggests that “God will crown those heads which have been fountains of tears”(83) with great rewards in heaven. While it is true that tears will often accompany true repentance and brokenness before the Lord, the tears have no meritorious effect. The only thing that will obtain pardon is Christ’s blood. This overemphasis on tears of repentance, while certainly well intentioned, might mislead some during repentance.

A final weakness is the weak hermeneutic employed by Watson on occasion. He tends to use a small phrase taken from the Old Testament to make a significant point. For example, he uses the phrase “the sword shall be upon his right eye” to support his conclusion that Satan carries away sinners hooded to hell (18). Similarly, he suggests that the brazen laver was a type for a double laver, indicating that “the laver of Christ’s blood we must wash in by faith, and the laver of tears we must wash in by repentance” (20). This attempt to mix Old Testament law with New testament practice is also seen in his insistence on restitution (24). These points are examples of the hermeneutic of types that was commonly practiced during his time, and Watson, therefore, should not be held unfairly criticized for them. We must not, however, accept statements based on these faulty principles either.

This is a wonderful book that should be read by every Christian, particularly those who are seeking the assurance of their own salvation. Ministers who are attempting to return their churches to a biblical understanding of conversion will find this work helpful. Perhaps the best evidence of the importance and relevance of Thomas Watson’s writings is there longevity.

End Notes

1. Watson, Thomas.  The Doctrine of Repentance. Car isle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1999.
122 pp.

Posted in Book Reviews, Puritans, Revival - Tagged Culture, Evangelism, Puritans, Repentance, Revival

Religion Can Get In the Way Of Your Own Salvation Part 2

Apr26
2012
Written by Warner Smith

If you have always gone to church you could have trouble accepting the truth that you need a spiritual rebirth.  According to Jesus’ teaching everyone “must be born again.”

We all need to be twice born.  Once “from above,” or a supernatural rebirth.

Christianity at its very core, is about our each having a supernatural rebirth. This rebirth can only be accomplished through a genuine work of God.  God alone can make it happen. This second birth can only be received by faith, and if God does not make it happen after you receive it by faith then it will never happen. Why? Because you and I do not have the ability within ourselves to make it happen. This makes us feel helpless, but the truth is only God can make it happen. All you can do is throw yourself upon His mercy and cry out for His grace.

But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.     John 1:12-13

In Greek, the word translated “right,”is  (εξουσίαν) exousia. It means the right or freedom of choice, authority, and ability or power.  It means all three of those things. You and I have the God given right or freedom to choose to receive Him.  We have His authority to choose to receive Him for ourselves, and He has given us the ability to make the choice to receive Him. God has given us the right, the authority, and the power to become children of God.  He gives this right, authority and power to everyone who will believe in His name.

We are not born into God’s kingdom through any natural process.  Our blood does not qualify us, nor our ancestry, only God can initiate this second birth.  People tell me very often that their parents were great Christians, and they somehow assume that their parents faith passed to them genetically.

Unfortunately this is not the case.  Mom and Dad passed down to you a sinful nature known as depravity. They needed to be born again just as you I need to be born again.  God has to work the miracle of salvation deep within you through His Spirit or it will not happen.

A true spiritual rebirth will not occur through religion. It will only happen through a life changing encounter.  You need to know this because you need to tell others that only a life changing encounter with Jesus Christ can forgive sin.  Not only does He forgive your sins, but a genuine rebirth will alter your nature.  Deep within your spirit God will change your inclination to agree with His will forever. You can still sin, but inside your core you will grieve.  You will feel terrible, because God the Holy Spirit will convict you and condemn your sin.

This second birth is a spiritual birth.

5 Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. 6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.    John 3:5–6 (ESV)

Someone recently asked me what being born of the water meant in this text.  The best answer will fit the context of the passage.  This text is an example of Hebrew thought being translated into Greek.  Hebrew often uses parallelism to expand and complete a thought.  Being born of water is to be understood as the parallel for being born of the flesh.  Being born of water or of the flesh parallels being born of the Spirit.  When our mothers water breaks we are born of water, when we exit her womb we are born of the flesh.

The point of this text is to explain the necessity of our being born of the Spirit.  God the Holy Spirit must be the midwife of our being reborn or we will not be truly born again.  While I have the right to choose, God’s Spirit must also be involved.  Many people have walked an aisle, shook hands with their pastor and joined the church, but were not born again.  If God’s Spirit is not involved your nature will not change and sooner or later you will claim that Christianity did not work for you.  The reason for this is that you tried to be born again by your own will in your own power and God’s Spirit was not involved.

This second birth is a spiritual birth or it becomes only an empty religious ritual that has no saving power.

We all “must” be born again or we cannot enter the kingdom of God.

Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘you must be born again,’    John 3:7

In Greek the word translate “must” is dei.  It means a divine necessity. In other words a spiritual rebirth is a divine necessity.  It is nonnegotiable.  You, me and everyone else who has ever or will ever walk the face of this earth must be born again, there are no exceptions.  Jesus did not say:

  • Nicodemus, it’s important for you to be born again, or
  • Nicodemus it will help you to be born again, or
  • Nicodemus you will achieve your spiritual ambition if you add this component of rebirth to you religion.

He said, Nicodemus You Must Be Born Again!  If you are NOT born again you, the CEO of religion in Jerusalem, will not see the kingdom of God.  This concept is at the very heart of Christianity. There is no substitute. You cannot substitute church for this rebirth.  You cannot substitute your parents relationship with Christ for your own.  You will not get a pass because of your denominations understanding of salvation.  You, each and everyone must be born again!

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Church, Culture, Evangelism, Manhood, Unchurched

Book Review: Pilgrims In Their Own Land

Apr26
2012
Written by Warner Smith

In Pilgrims in Their Own Land 1 Martin Marty catalogs the history of religion in the United States. Marty traces the pilgrimage of immigrants to American soil while paying close attention to their religious beliefs and practices. After examining each group’s religious beliefs, he then explores the interplay between new beliefs and those that were previously existing. Marty also observes the various new ideas and aberrations which Americans have contributed to religion.

As a professor of the History of Modern Christianity at the University of Chicago and the author of numerous books, Martin Marty is very qualified to write on the subject of religion in America. He views the population of the United States to be on a continuous religious pilgrimage, in which potential religious choices increase with the arrival of each new immigrant. Although Marty seems to conclude that these religious choices will continuously increase, he offers four broad categories under which the history of most religious expression in America may be placed. While these four categories are by no means exhaustive, they provide the necessary handles one requires in order to grasp the rich tapestry of America’s religious identity. These four categories are Protestantism, Catholicism, Judaism, and secular humanism.

The major player in the religious history of America is Protestantism. The profound and lasting influence the Puritans have had on all those who have followed is difficult to overstate. While American Protestants have all acknowledged a regard for the Holy Scriptures, they have differed widely in practice and their allowance for diversity of viewpoints. This has caused many new sects to form as new opinions have advanced and new practices have gained credence. This fragmentation is exemplified by the Disciples of Christ who, in their search for primitive Christianity, effectively divided the church more by providing yet another choice from which religious pilgrims might choose. There were others who initially sought to return to the primitive roots of Christianity but founded whole new faiths instead which were unrecognizable to orthodox Christians. Among those claiming revelations equal or superior to the Christian scriptures were the Mormons, Adventists, and Christian Scientists. Also, Transcendentalists like Thoreau and Emerson who sought to simplify religion created their own (262).

Throughout his book Marty conveys two themes regarding American Protestantism. First, he shows how Protestantism has been dominant in shaping religious thought since the beginning of the United States. Second, he reveals how American Protestantism has constantly been required to reevaluate itself as it has been forced to deal with the new notions of immigrants from without and innovators from within American society. According to Marty, America has said, in effect, to immigrants, “Well, we guess you are going to stay and we guess you are more or less welcome — but you have to change” (271).

While continual fragmentation of American Protestantism has made it hard to follow each variant, three general trends can be discerned. First, American Evangelical beliefs have remained remarkably close to their Puritan forefathers. Second, liberal theologies within mainline Protestantism have produced a type of religious expression that, from time to time, is not only different from its ancestor but openly hostile to it. Third, American Protestantism has produced a wide panoply of cults whose claims have led many away from Christian faith and practice.

The second broad category of American religious history is Catholicism. Catholicism was the first form of Christianity to be introduced on American soil. After Columbus and the Conquistadores came Jesuits who were genuinely interested in the salvation of the native Americans. Due to political differences and competition between the Spanish and French Catholics, an adequate window of opportunity was created which English Protestants seized. Because of these events, with the exception of pockets of missionary activity in the American southwest Catholic influences had to await the immigrants of the eighteenth century to gain a significant foothold in American religious thought. This foothold grew, and by the twentieth century Catholicism could boast of having elected one of their own as President of the United States. From after, Vatican II relations with the old established sects of Protestantism continued to improve. In 1958 Jacques Martian offered a revealing look at the religious landscape of America which apparently significantly affected the author giving him one of his major themes. Martian wrote “Americans seem to be in their own land as pilgrims, prodded by a dream. They are always on the move . . . , not settled, installed” (431).

The third broad category of American religious history is Judaism. Having been practiced in America since colonial times, American Jews have enjoyed a tolerance previously unknown among the nations of the world. With one exception in 1658 America, Marty records that no Jewish believer has had to stand trial for blasphemy (84). In fact, America’s tolerance fostered the atmosphere in which Isaac Mayer Wise and his Reform party of Judaism could speak of “the American way” (288), stifling for some time visions of Jewish Zionism among American Jews. Wise’s message, nurtured by his optimism in America was that “Reform Judaism was not just a faith for Jews but was the faith for moderns, the fulfillment for Americans” (290).

The fourth broad category of American religious history is secular humanism. The beginnings of secular humanism can be traced to the founding father’s desire to create a religion from the state. Prior to the constitution’s ratification, “Benjamin Franklin called for a ‘public religion,’” (154). This religion denied the divinity of Christ while agreeing with the moral code that Jesus advanced (157). George Washington, through his ambiguous statements about religion, also further advanced the idea of a secular religion (158). This public religion became rooted in America’s legal, educational, and political systems. This new secular, or public religion, had “Its creed in the Declaration (of Independence), its prophecies in the most compelling lines of presidential addresses, its psalms in some American poetry” (165). Marty writes that by eighteen hundred this secular religion was strong enough that it was a rival to the traditional church (169). Prior to the War Between the States in 1838, Abraham Lincoln was able to clearly articulate what Franklin had earlier voiced. Lincoln said that “reverence for laws must produce ‘the political religion of the nation,’ and this religion . . . should call forth unceasing sacrifice on its altar” (222). This strain of secularism found a strong advocate in the theories of Darwin which, when combined with the shift away from biblical Christianity within the academy, provided another secular voice with which the churches must vie.

Several apparent biases appear throughout this book. As Marty attempts to explain Queen Isabella’s of Spain inner war, he lists revulsion for the “cocksureness, even fanaticism with which believers felt that God chartered their version of faith as being alone the pure and true one” (16).

Another example of bias is evident in Marty’s discussion of the Great Awakening. Marty is not certain that there was a significant declension preceding the revivals (108). Furthermore, he engages in the historians’ fallacy of insinuating motivation to the revivalists during this awakening. He writes that “to get the revival off the ground, the pioneers . . . had to demonstrate a need in the colonies. Never trust a revivalist preacher for a fully accurate picture of how bad the times were spiritually” (109). Not only does Marty have a bias against the revivalists’ trustworthiness in accurately portraying the times preceding the revival, he also implies that there possibly were problems with Edwards’ motivation in four areas of this revival. First, Marty implies that Edwards studied crowd psychology in the conversions occurring in other towns (114), possibly suggesting causation in the revival of Northampton. Second, he attributes an impure motive to Edwards’ in rewriting history with Northampton as its climax for the purpose of increasing the peoples’ reaction to the revival. Third, Marty states that Edwards placed the “Made in America” stamp on the revival even though he knew there were similar revivals breaking out on the European continent (115). Fourth, Marty’s bias against Edwards is further revealed in his description of Edwards’ book on the revival as “six quaint pages in a book rarely read about an awakening most Americans never heard of” (116).

Again evidence of an anti-evangelical bias by Marty is revealed when he writes that George Whitfield, following his conversion, engaged in “spreading the charge revivalists like to make: that one may go to church and say prayers but still not be a Christian without a specific experience” (118).

Yet another example of bias on Marty’s part is apparent when, in his discussion of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary professor Crawford H. Toy, he writes that “Toy unfortunately had to test his ideas . . . in the Southern Baptist Convention”(304). Toy agreed with the new theory which German scholars taught: that when studying the Scripture, “the kernel of truth” must be separated “from its outer covering of myth” (305). These views were discussed within the Southern Baptist Convention leading Toy to resign.

A more remarkable occurrence of bias is Marty’s statement that Mary Baker Eddy’s Christian Science movement “was one of the most impressive visions and achievements on the American spiritual landscape” (331). Once more Marty shows his liberal bias over and against current conservative views when he counts as one of the most vital signs of mainline church strengthening “the efforts to break two-thousand-year-old patterns of male dominance in religion” (438).

Overall, this is a helpful edition which provides a thorough treatment of the diverse religious background of America’s people. Marty’s treatment is, in the main, as balanced as modern evangelicals may expect from any but their own writers. There is a rich collection of historic information contained in this volume which makes it profitable for anyone seeking to begin to gain an understanding of America’s religious heritage.

End Notes

1. Marty, Martin. Pilgrims in Their Own Land. New York: Penguin Books, 1984. 488 pp.

Posted in Book Reviews, Revival - Tagged Church, Culture, Evangelism, Puritans, Revival, worldview

Religion Can Get In The Way Of Your Own Salvation

Apr25
2012
Written by Warner Smith

Many Christians were raised in the church.  For some this Christian heritage gets in the way of their own salvation.  In John Jesus talks to someone whose spiritual heritage is getting in the way of his own salvation.  His name is Nicodemus and he has one of the most impressive spiritual resumes in all of the New Testament.

Now there was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews; this man came to Him by night and said to Him, Rabbi, we know that you have come from God as a teacher; for no one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him. Jesus answered and said to him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Nicodemus said to Him, “How can a man be born when he is old?  He cannot enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born, can he?” Jesus answered. “Truly, truly I say to you unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit, Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit. Nicodemus answered and said to Him, How can these things be? Jesus answered and said to him, “Are you the teacher of Israel, and do not understand these things?    John 3: 1-10

Nicodemus was a Pharisee who was a ruler of the Jews. In Greek the presence of the definite article “the” is very important.  Sometimes it is left off for the purpose of adding emphasis. It is absent for this purpose in this text, to say to us that Nicodemus is “THE” most prominent person.  In Greek, we can understand this to read “there was a Pharisee named Nicodemus, ruler of the Jews.” He was the CEO of religion in Jerusalem.

Nicodemus asks Jesus a question “Rabbi, we know that you have come from God as a teacher; for no one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him.”  Jesus didn’t answer his question.  He did not say, yes, I am from God. Instead he said “Nicodemus do you want to know where you really stand in your relationship with God?  I want you to know that unless you are born again you, the CEO of religion in Jerusalem, will not see the kingdom of God.”

This answer baffled Nicodemus.  We mistakenly think this is the first time Nicodemus had heard the term, “born again,” but it was a common phrase among the Jews.

When you were circumcised on the eighth day you were said to have been born again. When you went through the rite of  your bar mitzvah you were said to have been born again.  When you were married, you were said to have been born again.  When you turned forty, you were said to have been born again.  Were you to become a Rabbi you were said to have been born again.

Nicodemus understood the term “born again” as it related to his practice of Judaism. What he did not understand was Jesus telling him that he must be born again, again. He was thinking I am a Jew, I have been circumcised, I have been bar mitzvahed, I am married, I am now over forty and I am a Rabbi, in fact I am “The Rabbi” in Israel. In other words, Nicodemus is saying “I have had all of the born again experiences in Judaism and you, Jesus, are telling me that I must be born again!”

He is totally shocked. Nicodemus was confused: thinking “How can I do that, when I have already done it all.”

Many Christians who grew up in church are like Nicodemus.  They think “I grew up with Christian parents, I have gone to church all of my life.  I have gone through catechism class, I have learned all of the liturgies and rituals.  I was in the choir, or I was in the youth group.  So when they hear  Jesus is saying, “you to must be born again.”  Some church people who have done their religious duty all of their life, do not truly understand that they must also be born again.  Religious people also need to be changed from within by regeneration.

Nicodemus did synagogue, just like some people today, do church.  Doing church doesn’t save anyone!

. . . unless one is born of water and spirit he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, You must be born again. The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it but do not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit.

Jesus is saying the Spirit is not something you can predict.  He is not a formula, He is God, He is the movement of God.  Nicodemus throws up his hands and says, “how can these things be?”  Jesus ask him, “Are you the teacher of Israel, and you don’t understand these things?” Nicodemus is totally confused when it comes to really talking about the things of the Spirit of God.

When Jesus wants to talk about spiritual things, Nicodemus wants to talk about church attendance. Nicodemus can only talk about duty, the law.  Nicodemus wants to talk in terms of the outside of man while Jesus’ language is about the inner man.

A. T. Robertson, a great theological scholar said: “this well known authorized teacher of Israel was told by Jesus that his theology had made him immune to spiritual apprehension.”

Are you like Nicodemus?  Are you trusting in the outer signs of your religion to save you and forgoing asking God to re-create you from the inside, through His Spirit as you call on the name of His Son, Jesus.

Please for the sake of your eternal soul ask Jesus Christ to give you the spiritual new birth!

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Evangelism, Manhood, Personal Holiness, Unchurched
← Older Entries Newer Entries →

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bearings Class
  • Book Reviews
  • Daily Devotions
  • Ministry Thoughts
  • Nehemiah and Mark Bible Studies
  • Podcasts
  • Preaching
  • Puritans
  • Revival
  • The Huddle
  • The Persecuted Church
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


 Subscribe in a reader

Recent Comments

  • joeyfaulk on 40 Days of Preparation Day 17
  • Brenda Hagan on 40 Days of Preparation Day 17
  • Carole Earwood on In Search of Biblical Revival, The Need for Revival Part 2
  • Chris Bevil on Hidden Worldviews, Why Do You Believe What You Believe?
  • Brenda Hagan on A Man and His Daughters

Nehemiah and Mark Studies

The Mark Bible Study The Nehemiah Bible Study

Recent Publications

2010 Church Consulting Future Trends Report

Blogroll

  • Lifeway Research
  • TED: Ideas worth spreading
  • The Long View

Ministry Resources

  • Church Planting Movements
  • David Mays's Booknotes
  • Faith in Action
  • Great Commission Initiative
  • IMB Global Research
  • Mission to Unreached Peoples
  • People Groups
  • Voice of the Martyr's

Pastor Resources

  • MAPChurch

Staff Blogs

  • Joey Faulk

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009

EvoLve theme by Theme4Press  •  Powered by WordPress Warner Smith