Warner Smith
  • Warner Smith
  • Sermons
  • Daily Devotions
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
Follow

Posts tagged Culture

Book Review: The Doctrine of Repentance

Apr29
2012
Written by Warner Smith

In the Doctrine of Repentance 1 Thomas Watson goes to great lengths to impress upon his reader the basis of his thesis that both the gravity of sin and the blessings of repentance dictate that all men everywhere repent at once. He presents his arguments, against sin and in favor of repentance, by attempting to overcome every possible objection his audience might raise with a thoroughness that would cause his audience to flee their sin and run to God pleading for His many mercies. While initially directed to the Christians of seventeenth-century England, this discourse has great application for Christians of every age.

The last two chapters provide a good summary for the entire book. Watson wants the reader to give serious consideration to what sin is (106-113) and to the ramifications of neglecting God’s offer of grace (114-118), while he also entices the reader to make a realistic comparison between the impenitent person and the penitent one (119-122).

Watson warns his reader against counterfeit repentance (15-17) by listing three common deceits. First, he states that one may experience the terror of conviction for their sin without turning from their sin. Second, he points out that some make deals with God in hopes of averting either some present painful situation or a perceived future circumstance in Hell. Thirdly, he warns that others may reform significant portions of their life but not all, thereby simply exchanging one sin for another.

Next, Watson gives his reader the six ingredients of repentance. Repentance, according to Watson, is made up of sight of sin, sorrow for sin, confession of sin, shame of sin, hatred for sin, and turning from sin. Following this, he moves to commending repentance to his reader by using both negative and positive means as he lists the various reasons that enforce repentance and warnings to the unrepentant. Subsequently, he turns his attention to two branches of exhortation designed to motivate repentance. Watson then shows the various comforts repentance offers the penitent and ten common obstacles that prevent true repentance.

One example of the thoroughness of Watson’s approach can be seen in his treatment of ten reasons repentance is necessary for Christians. In this section he points out that true Christians must understand repentance to be a continuous act and not merely a one-time occurrence. The whole of our lives must be lived repentantly.

The reader finds a treasure in Watson’s discussion of true repentance which will assist in providing a possible explanation for the common question of why bad things happen to good people while those who do not live for God seem unaffected by life’s tragedies is found. He writes,

That sin is worse than affliction is evident because the greatest judgement God lays upon man in this life is to let him sin without control. When the Lord’s displeasure is most severely kindled against a person, he does not say, I will bring the sword and the plague upon this man, but, I will let him sin on . . . if the giving up of a man to his sins is the most dreadful evil, then sin is far worse than affliction (50).

A primary strength of this book is its practicality. In his thoroughness Watson provides answers for almost all the questions one might have about his own repentance. One such example is the aforementioned discussion of his ten reasons repentance is necessary for every Christian. Another example of this practicality that makes this book important for Christians to read is Watson’s treatment of the confession of sin (28- 36). By focusing on various qualifications that need to be present in one’s confession and the focus on four types of people who make faulty confessions, Watson helps Christians examine their own hearts and determine the reality of their own confessions. Watson provides a balanced treatment of the effects of one’s confession on God as well as on the individual. This methodical approach is very helpful, particularly when understood in light of his first qualification, that “confession must be voluntary” (29). This qualification is a blow thrown against the current perception of Puritans as being overbearing and doctrinaire in their approach to the individual.

A second strength of this work for Christians is the focus Watson gives to the nature and effect of our sins. In his answer of the question “What is there in sin that may make a penitent hate it?”, he gives “a fourfold conceit” (48). Watson states that a person who has truly been repentant will come to hate sin because: sin comes from hell, sin’s nature will appear dishonoring to God, sin appears appalling in its comparison to holiness, and sin’s consequences on one’s own body and soul are abhorrent (48-51). This list is very helpful for those trying to reach secular people today, particularly in its balance between the slight sinners give a holy God and the effects sin has on the individual. Again, this balance is not what one expects from a Puritan writer based on their contemporary reputation.

A third strength of this book that has great importance for readers today is the emphasis Watson places on his argument that there is no such thing as a carnal Christian. He writes, “It is inconsistent with the sanctity of God’s nature to pardon a sinner while he is in the act of rebellion” (60). He suggests that when people half turn from sin “in their judgement but not in their practice” (56), the result is a life that “may be moralized [but] the lust [is] unmortified” (67). Watson uses the story of the evil spirit that leaves a man, but then says he will return to the house he left, and finding it cleaned and organized, the evil spirit brings seven other spirits with him so that the latter end is worse than the former (Luke 11:24-26) to explain the dangers this failure to truly repent harbors. This concept of the failure of persons to be completely repentant gives a cogent explanation as to why so many church members are powerless in their personal lives and why so many churches are not having greater impact upon their surrounding communities.

One weakness that this work contains is Watson’s potential to overstate his argument. He equates shame for sin with blushing. Any outward appearance cannot be expected to completely and accurately reflect the inner reality within an individual’s heart. While shame for sin is important, and missing in too many today, it is an overstatement to say that “If Christ’s blood were not at the sinner’s heart, there would not so much blood come to the face”(39).

Another example of this tendency to overstate is the possible impression that its focus on tears could make on some as a necessary work in legitimizing their repentance. There are statements in which Watson appears to make the tears of repentance meritorious. Watson does list in two paragraphs “a necessary caution” (96) in which he writes “I grant repenting tears are precious . . . but yet, tears are not satisfactory for sin . . . Christ’s blood only can merit pardon. . . to trust in our repentance is to make it a saviour” (96). In spite of this disclaimer, however, there are many more instances in which Watson gives emphasis throughout his work to the importance of tears in repentance. In his conclusion of his ingredients of repentance he writes, “God would rather have our repenting tears than our blood” (58). One of his powerful motives to excite repentance is that “repenting tears are delicious” (77), and then he states that “Mary Magdalene . . . obtained pardon when she washed Christ’s feet with her tears”(78). He continues this idea by stating that “never do the flowers of grace grow more than after a shower of repenting tears” (79), and this is closely followed by the suggestion that “when we put the water of tears into God’s bottle, this fetches up wine”(80). He suggests that “God will crown those heads which have been fountains of tears”(83) with great rewards in heaven. While it is true that tears will often accompany true repentance and brokenness before the Lord, the tears have no meritorious effect. The only thing that will obtain pardon is Christ’s blood. This overemphasis on tears of repentance, while certainly well intentioned, might mislead some during repentance.

A final weakness is the weak hermeneutic employed by Watson on occasion. He tends to use a small phrase taken from the Old Testament to make a significant point. For example, he uses the phrase “the sword shall be upon his right eye” to support his conclusion that Satan carries away sinners hooded to hell (18). Similarly, he suggests that the brazen laver was a type for a double laver, indicating that “the laver of Christ’s blood we must wash in by faith, and the laver of tears we must wash in by repentance” (20). This attempt to mix Old Testament law with New testament practice is also seen in his insistence on restitution (24). These points are examples of the hermeneutic of types that was commonly practiced during his time, and Watson, therefore, should not be held unfairly criticized for them. We must not, however, accept statements based on these faulty principles either.

This is a wonderful book that should be read by every Christian, particularly those who are seeking the assurance of their own salvation. Ministers who are attempting to return their churches to a biblical understanding of conversion will find this work helpful. Perhaps the best evidence of the importance and relevance of Thomas Watson’s writings is there longevity.

End Notes

1. Watson, Thomas.  The Doctrine of Repentance. Car isle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1999.
122 pp.

Posted in Book Reviews, Puritans, Revival - Tagged Biblical Truth, Evangelism, Puritans, Repentance, Revival

Religion Can Get In the Way Of Your Own Salvation Part 2

Apr26
2012
Written by Warner Smith

If you have always gone to church you could have trouble accepting the truth that you need a spiritual rebirth.  According to Jesus’ teaching everyone “must be born again.”

We all need to be twice born.  Once “from above,” or a supernatural rebirth.

Christianity at its very core, is about our each having a supernatural rebirth. This rebirth can only be accomplished through a genuine work of God.  God alone can make it happen. This second birth can only be received by faith, and if God does not make it happen after you receive it by faith then it will never happen. Why? Because you and I do not have the ability within ourselves to make it happen. This makes us feel helpless, but the truth is only God can make it happen. All you can do is throw yourself upon His mercy and cry out for His grace.

But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.     John 1:12-13

In Greek, the word translated “right,”is  (εξουσίαν) exousia. It means the right or freedom of choice, authority, and ability or power.  It means all three of those things. You and I have the God given right or freedom to choose to receive Him.  We have His authority to choose to receive Him for ourselves, and He has given us the ability to make the choice to receive Him. God has given us the right, the authority, and the power to become children of God.  He gives this right, authority and power to everyone who will believe in His name.

We are not born into God’s kingdom through any natural process.  Our blood does not qualify us, nor our ancestry, only God can initiate this second birth.  People tell me very often that their parents were great Christians, and they somehow assume that their parents faith passed to them genetically.

Unfortunately this is not the case.  Mom and Dad passed down to you a sinful nature known as depravity. They needed to be born again just as you I need to be born again.  God has to work the miracle of salvation deep within you through His Spirit or it will not happen.

A true spiritual rebirth will not occur through religion. It will only happen through a life changing encounter.  You need to know this because you need to tell others that only a life changing encounter with Jesus Christ can forgive sin.  Not only does He forgive your sins, but a genuine rebirth will alter your nature.  Deep within your spirit God will change your inclination to agree with His will forever. You can still sin, but inside your core you will grieve.  You will feel terrible, because God the Holy Spirit will convict you and condemn your sin.

This second birth is a spiritual birth.

5 Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. 6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.    John 3:5–6 (ESV)

Someone recently asked me what being born of the water meant in this text.  The best answer will fit the context of the passage.  This text is an example of Hebrew thought being translated into Greek.  Hebrew often uses parallelism to expand and complete a thought.  Being born of water is to be understood as the parallel for being born of the flesh.  Being born of water or of the flesh parallels being born of the Spirit.  When our mothers water breaks we are born of water, when we exit her womb we are born of the flesh.

The point of this text is to explain the necessity of our being born of the Spirit.  God the Holy Spirit must be the midwife of our being reborn or we will not be truly born again.  While I have the right to choose, God’s Spirit must also be involved.  Many people have walked an aisle, shook hands with their pastor and joined the church, but were not born again.  If God’s Spirit is not involved your nature will not change and sooner or later you will claim that Christianity did not work for you.  The reason for this is that you tried to be born again by your own will in your own power and God’s Spirit was not involved.

This second birth is a spiritual birth or it becomes only an empty religious ritual that has no saving power.

We all “must” be born again or we cannot enter the kingdom of God.

Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘you must be born again,’    John 3:7

In Greek the word translate “must” is dei.  It means a divine necessity. In other words a spiritual rebirth is a divine necessity.  It is nonnegotiable.  You, me and everyone else who has ever or will ever walk the face of this earth must be born again, there are no exceptions.  Jesus did not say:

  • Nicodemus, it’s important for you to be born again, or
  • Nicodemus it will help you to be born again, or
  • Nicodemus you will achieve your spiritual ambition if you add this component of rebirth to you religion.

He said, Nicodemus You Must Be Born Again!  If you are NOT born again you, the CEO of religion in Jerusalem, will not see the kingdom of God.  This concept is at the very heart of Christianity. There is no substitute. You cannot substitute church for this rebirth.  You cannot substitute your parents relationship with Christ for your own.  You will not get a pass because of your denominations understanding of salvation.  You, each and everyone must be born again!

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Biblical Truth, Church, Evangelism, Manhood, Unchurched

Book Review: Pilgrims In Their Own Land

Apr26
2012
Written by Warner Smith

In Pilgrims in Their Own Land 1 Martin Marty catalogs the history of religion in the United States. Marty traces the pilgrimage of immigrants to American soil while paying close attention to their religious beliefs and practices. After examining each group’s religious beliefs, he then explores the interplay between new beliefs and those that were previously existing. Marty also observes the various new ideas and aberrations which Americans have contributed to religion.

As a professor of the History of Modern Christianity at the University of Chicago and the author of numerous books, Martin Marty is very qualified to write on the subject of religion in America. He views the population of the United States to be on a continuous religious pilgrimage, in which potential religious choices increase with the arrival of each new immigrant. Although Marty seems to conclude that these religious choices will continuously increase, he offers four broad categories under which the history of most religious expression in America may be placed. While these four categories are by no means exhaustive, they provide the necessary handles one requires in order to grasp the rich tapestry of America’s religious identity. These four categories are Protestantism, Catholicism, Judaism, and secular humanism.

The major player in the religious history of America is Protestantism. The profound and lasting influence the Puritans have had on all those who have followed is difficult to overstate. While American Protestants have all acknowledged a regard for the Holy Scriptures, they have differed widely in practice and their allowance for diversity of viewpoints. This has caused many new sects to form as new opinions have advanced and new practices have gained credence. This fragmentation is exemplified by the Disciples of Christ who, in their search for primitive Christianity, effectively divided the church more by providing yet another choice from which religious pilgrims might choose. There were others who initially sought to return to the primitive roots of Christianity but founded whole new faiths instead which were unrecognizable to orthodox Christians. Among those claiming revelations equal or superior to the Christian scriptures were the Mormons, Adventists, and Christian Scientists. Also, Transcendentalists like Thoreau and Emerson who sought to simplify religion created their own (262).

Throughout his book Marty conveys two themes regarding American Protestantism. First, he shows how Protestantism has been dominant in shaping religious thought since the beginning of the United States. Second, he reveals how American Protestantism has constantly been required to reevaluate itself as it has been forced to deal with the new notions of immigrants from without and innovators from within American society. According to Marty, America has said, in effect, to immigrants, “Well, we guess you are going to stay and we guess you are more or less welcome — but you have to change” (271).

While continual fragmentation of American Protestantism has made it hard to follow each variant, three general trends can be discerned. First, American Evangelical beliefs have remained remarkably close to their Puritan forefathers. Second, liberal theologies within mainline Protestantism have produced a type of religious expression that, from time to time, is not only different from its ancestor but openly hostile to it. Third, American Protestantism has produced a wide panoply of cults whose claims have led many away from Christian faith and practice.

The second broad category of American religious history is Catholicism. Catholicism was the first form of Christianity to be introduced on American soil. After Columbus and the Conquistadores came Jesuits who were genuinely interested in the salvation of the native Americans. Due to political differences and competition between the Spanish and French Catholics, an adequate window of opportunity was created which English Protestants seized. Because of these events, with the exception of pockets of missionary activity in the American southwest Catholic influences had to await the immigrants of the eighteenth century to gain a significant foothold in American religious thought. This foothold grew, and by the twentieth century Catholicism could boast of having elected one of their own as President of the United States. From after, Vatican II relations with the old established sects of Protestantism continued to improve. In 1958 Jacques Martian offered a revealing look at the religious landscape of America which apparently significantly affected the author giving him one of his major themes. Martian wrote “Americans seem to be in their own land as pilgrims, prodded by a dream. They are always on the move . . . , not settled, installed” (431).

The third broad category of American religious history is Judaism. Having been practiced in America since colonial times, American Jews have enjoyed a tolerance previously unknown among the nations of the world. With one exception in 1658 America, Marty records that no Jewish believer has had to stand trial for blasphemy (84). In fact, America’s tolerance fostered the atmosphere in which Isaac Mayer Wise and his Reform party of Judaism could speak of “the American way” (288), stifling for some time visions of Jewish Zionism among American Jews. Wise’s message, nurtured by his optimism in America was that “Reform Judaism was not just a faith for Jews but was the faith for moderns, the fulfillment for Americans” (290).

The fourth broad category of American religious history is secular humanism. The beginnings of secular humanism can be traced to the founding father’s desire to create a religion from the state. Prior to the constitution’s ratification, “Benjamin Franklin called for a ‘public religion,’” (154). This religion denied the divinity of Christ while agreeing with the moral code that Jesus advanced (157). George Washington, through his ambiguous statements about religion, also further advanced the idea of a secular religion (158). This public religion became rooted in America’s legal, educational, and political systems. This new secular, or public religion, had “Its creed in the Declaration (of Independence), its prophecies in the most compelling lines of presidential addresses, its psalms in some American poetry” (165). Marty writes that by eighteen hundred this secular religion was strong enough that it was a rival to the traditional church (169). Prior to the War Between the States in 1838, Abraham Lincoln was able to clearly articulate what Franklin had earlier voiced. Lincoln said that “reverence for laws must produce ‘the political religion of the nation,’ and this religion . . . should call forth unceasing sacrifice on its altar” (222). This strain of secularism found a strong advocate in the theories of Darwin which, when combined with the shift away from biblical Christianity within the academy, provided another secular voice with which the churches must vie.

Several apparent biases appear throughout this book. As Marty attempts to explain Queen Isabella’s of Spain inner war, he lists revulsion for the “cocksureness, even fanaticism with which believers felt that God chartered their version of faith as being alone the pure and true one” (16).

Another example of bias is evident in Marty’s discussion of the Great Awakening. Marty is not certain that there was a significant declension preceding the revivals (108). Furthermore, he engages in the historians’ fallacy of insinuating motivation to the revivalists during this awakening. He writes that “to get the revival off the ground, the pioneers . . . had to demonstrate a need in the colonies. Never trust a revivalist preacher for a fully accurate picture of how bad the times were spiritually” (109). Not only does Marty have a bias against the revivalists’ trustworthiness in accurately portraying the times preceding the revival, he also implies that there possibly were problems with Edwards’ motivation in four areas of this revival. First, Marty implies that Edwards studied crowd psychology in the conversions occurring in other towns (114), possibly suggesting causation in the revival of Northampton. Second, he attributes an impure motive to Edwards’ in rewriting history with Northampton as its climax for the purpose of increasing the peoples’ reaction to the revival. Third, Marty states that Edwards placed the “Made in America” stamp on the revival even though he knew there were similar revivals breaking out on the European continent (115). Fourth, Marty’s bias against Edwards is further revealed in his description of Edwards’ book on the revival as “six quaint pages in a book rarely read about an awakening most Americans never heard of” (116).

Again evidence of an anti-evangelical bias by Marty is revealed when he writes that George Whitfield, following his conversion, engaged in “spreading the charge revivalists like to make: that one may go to church and say prayers but still not be a Christian without a specific experience” (118).

Yet another example of bias on Marty’s part is apparent when, in his discussion of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary professor Crawford H. Toy, he writes that “Toy unfortunately had to test his ideas . . . in the Southern Baptist Convention”(304). Toy agreed with the new theory which German scholars taught: that when studying the Scripture, “the kernel of truth” must be separated “from its outer covering of myth” (305). These views were discussed within the Southern Baptist Convention leading Toy to resign.

A more remarkable occurrence of bias is Marty’s statement that Mary Baker Eddy’s Christian Science movement “was one of the most impressive visions and achievements on the American spiritual landscape” (331). Once more Marty shows his liberal bias over and against current conservative views when he counts as one of the most vital signs of mainline church strengthening “the efforts to break two-thousand-year-old patterns of male dominance in religion” (438).

Overall, this is a helpful edition which provides a thorough treatment of the diverse religious background of America’s people. Marty’s treatment is, in the main, as balanced as modern evangelicals may expect from any but their own writers. There is a rich collection of historic information contained in this volume which makes it profitable for anyone seeking to begin to gain an understanding of America’s religious heritage.

End Notes

1. Marty, Martin. Pilgrims in Their Own Land. New York: Penguin Books, 1984. 488 pp.

Posted in Book Reviews, Revival - Tagged Biblical Truth, Church, Evangelism, Puritans, Revival, worldview

Jesus Encourages His Disciples To Be The Good News

Apr24
2012
Written by Warner Smith

Christians sometimes feel as though they do not fit into society.  The news of the day and other peoples opinions of it are often very different from ours.  I am often amazed when I speak to people who are not Christians.  I am often shocked by the attitudes and opinions which they hold.  The reason for this difference is that as a Christian we are aliens in this present world.

Dear friends, I urge you, as aliens and strangers in the world, to abstain from sinful desires, which war against your soul. 1 Peter 2:11 (NIV)

The longer one walks with the Lord the more you realize how different God’s ways are from the ways of the world.  When we dwell on how different this world is from what Christ’s will is it is easy for us to become discouraged and think “Why bother, why not just give up we are obviously not making any real difference in the world”?

When you feel this discouragement remember Jesus and his disciples faced enormous obstacles also.  He taught them two parables that encouraged them to be the good news and trust God for the results.

1. Do not be afraid of small beginnings.

According to Jesus great things can come from small beginnings.  Jesus taught His disciples;

“What is the kingdom of God like?  What shall I compare it to?  It is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his garden.  It grew and became a tree, and the birds of the air perched in its branches. Luke 13:18-19

The mustard seed is the smallest of the garden seeds, yet it may grow to a height of 30 feet in a single season.  Jesus is teaching His followers that the kingdom will start small yet it will grow.

2. Never underestimate the power of God to transform the world.

A little yeast can leaven a great amount of flour.

Again he asked, “What shall I compare it to? It is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into a large amount of flour until it worked all through the dough.” Luke 13:20-21

The lesson is that kingdom men and women can and will make an enormous difference in this world, as we live transformed lives.  Are you making a difference for the kingdom by the way you are living?

You may not think that your are.  If you are trying to live the Christian life but are discouraged by the results you see around you remember the words of the old hymn Little Is Much When God Is in It.

In the harvest field now ripened There’s a work for all to do;
Hark! the voice of God is calling To the harvest calling you.

Little is much when God is in it! Labor not for wealth or fame.
There’s a crown and you can win it, If you go in Jesus’ Name.

In the mad rush of the broad way, In the hurry and the strife,
Tell of Jesus’ love and mercy, Give to them the Word of Life.

Does the place you’re called to labor,  Seem too small and little known? It is great if God is in it, And He’ll not forget His own.

Little is much when God is in it! Labor not for wealth or fame.
There’s a crown and you can win it, If you go in Jesus’ Name.

Are you laid aside from service, Body worn from toil and care?
You can still be in the battle, In the sacred place of prayer.

When the conflict here is ended, And our race on earth is run,
He will say, if we are faithful, Welcome home, My child well done!

Little is much when God is in it! Labor not for wealth or fame.
There’s a crown and you can win it, If you go in Jesus’ Name.

Quit worrying about results.  Trust the results to God!  We just need to be the best seed and most active leaven we can be!

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Christian Maturity, Evangelism, Personal Holiness

Help May Be Closer Than You Think

Apr23
2012
Written by Warner Smith

Some days are better than others. Fridays are good, so good, in fact, that a restaurant chain has taken the initials of a common phrase spoken by most of us on Fridays as their name, “TGIF” (Thank God It’s Friday).  At the other end of the spectrum is Monday. The day we return to work is not often our favorite. The girl group The Bangles summarized how many feel in their song Manic Monday. If you don’t remember, let me remind you, the opening lines were:

Six o’clock already
I was just in the middle of a dream
I was kissin’ Valentino
By a crystal blue Italian stream
But I can’t be late
‘Cause then I guess I just won’t get paid
These are the days
When you wish your bed was already made

Another group, The Mamas And The Papas, of an earlier generation, verbalized some of our feelings in a line of their song Monday, Monday. The lines of this song is:

Monday Monday, can’t trust that day,
Monday Monday, sometimes it just turns out that way
Oh Monday morning, you gave me no warning of what was to be

There is truth in the statement “can’t trust that day.” We can’t trust any day, whether it be Monday, Friday, or any day. I have often been guilty of allowing the circumstances of life to prevent me from enjoying life. Too often I have been guilty of believing that “When x, y, or z occurs, then I will be able to relax, or enjoy myself.”

I have come to realize that this reasoning is poisonous. The reality is that you and I should not trust any day, we should only trust in the Lord everyday. If we are living in accordance to God’s will everyday will be worthwhile and meaningful, although not without challenges. Our Monday morning’s are nothing when compared to the morning “the servant of the man of God” had in 2 Kings 6:8-18. There we read:

Now the king of Aram was at war with Israel. After conferring with his officers, he said, “I will set up my camp in such and such a place.” The man of God sent word to the king of Israel: “Beware of passing that place, because the Arameans are going down there.” So the king of Israel checked on the place indicated by the man of God. Time and again Elisha warned the king, so that he was on his guard in such places. This enraged the king of Aram. He summoned his officers and demanded of them, “Will you not tell me which of us is on the side of the king of Israel?” “None of us, my lord the king,” said one of his officers, “but Elisha, the prophet who is in Israel, tells the king of Israel the very words you speak in your bedroom.” “Go, find out where he is,” the king ordered, “so I can send men and capture him.” The report came back: “He is in Dothan.” Then he sent horses and chariots and a strong force there. They went by night and surrounded the city. When the servant of the man of God got up and went out early the next morning, an army with horses and chariots had surrounded the city. “Oh, my lord, what shall we do?” the servant asked. “Don’t be afraid,” the prophet answered. “Those who are with us are more than those who are with them.” And Elisha prayed, “O Lord, open his eyes so he may see.” Then the Lord opened the servant’s eyes, and he looked and saw the hills full of horses and chariots of fire all around Elisha. 2 Kings 6:8-17 (NIV)

We each need to be men and women of God who can pray and show others that the help they seek is closer than they have imagined.

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Biblical Truth, Christian Maturity, Encouragement
← Older Entries

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bearings Class
  • Book Reviews
  • Daily Devotions
  • Ministry Thoughts
  • Nehemiah and Mark Bible Studies
  • Podcasts
  • Preaching
  • Puritans
  • Revival
  • The Huddle
  • The Persecuted Church
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


 Subscribe in a reader

Recent Comments

  • joeyfaulk on 40 Days of Preparation Day 17
  • Brenda Hagan on 40 Days of Preparation Day 17
  • Carole Earwood on In Search of Biblical Revival, The Need for Revival Part 2
  • Chris Bevil on Hidden Worldviews, Why Do You Believe What You Believe?
  • Brenda Hagan on A Man and His Daughters

Nehemiah and Mark Studies

The Mark Bible Study The Nehemiah Bible Study

Recent Publications

2010 Church Consulting Future Trends Report

Blogroll

  • Lifeway Research
  • TED: Ideas worth spreading
  • The Long View

Ministry Resources

  • Church Planting Movements
  • David Mays's Booknotes
  • Faith in Action
  • Great Commission Initiative
  • IMB Global Research
  • Mission to Unreached Peoples
  • People Groups
  • Voice of the Martyr's

Pastor Resources

  • MAPChurch

Staff Blogs

  • Joey Faulk

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009

EvoLve theme by Theme4Press  •  Powered by WordPress Warner Smith