Warner Smith
  • Warner Smith
  • Sermons
  • Daily Devotions
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews
Follow

Posts tagged Church

Book Review: The 12 Essential Skills For Great Preaching

May06
2012
Leave a Comment Written by Warner Smith

In The 12 Essential Skills For Great Preaching 1 Wayne McDill brings the strength of thirty five years of pastoral experience to bear on the task of preparing to deliver sermons from the biblical texts.  Currently serving as a professor of preaching at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, he has also written Evangelism in a Tangled World, Becoming Who You Are, Making Friends for Christ, and The Message.

McDill believes that “preachers can significantly improve their preaching by strengthening twelve specific skills used in the preparation of sermons” (2).  McDill does not accept that effective preaching is an endeavor which only the most gifted can pursue.  Rather, he believes that “anyone can learn the methods used in the preparation of good sermons” (13). McDill does not often use the term expository preaching preferring instead to discuss biblical preaching; however, it is clear by his definition that expository preaching is what he has in mind. He defines biblical sermons as those “in which the text shapes the sermon.  The purpose, the theme, the structure, and the development of the sermon are to reflect the text” (14).  Unlike many preaching texts this book seeks to deal with this single approach to preaching alone.

Following the introductory chapter, McDill works out his thesis through twelve chapters that each develop one of the skills for great preaching.  Each chapter contains exercises which are designed for self study so that the reader can improve this skill in preaching on his own.  The books seems to be directed toward the beginning preacher or the bi-vocational preacher who desires to engage in a directed self study.

The first three chapters deal with the skills necessary for inductive Bible study.  McDill posits that “a growing number of preachers are finding that the best approach to their text study is inductive” (21).  The first skill necessary for inductive study of the text is learning to see the structural relationship within the text.  In order to accomplish this skill, McDill introduces the reader to an exercise in developing structural diagrams.  His approach rests on the assumption that main points will be those with the most supporting ideas.  He also discusses the importance of discerning the connectives used by the author in assisting to determine his original intention.  In the next two chapters McDill provides guidelines for making observations about the text and asking the questions of the text which assist in discovering the  meaning of the author.

The next three chapters explain how one should contextualize the ideas of the biblical text and place them into the contemporary world of the audience.  McDill suggests the best way to determine the idea being put forward in a biblical text is to ask and answer the question, “What is the writer talking about?” (89), and that one should seek to obtain a one-word answer.  This subject should then be limited by identifying how the biblical writer limits the scope of the subject within the text itself.  According to McDill, this exercise will assist one in clarifying his thinking so that he will not become guilty of “the great fault of preaching is fuzzy thinking” (94).  McDill realizes that the biblical text must be understood on an emotional and personal level.  He offers that, by identifying the symptoms, assumptions, consequences and feelings of those in need of the text’s message, one can apply the biblical truths to the congregation.  McDill concludes this section by leading the reader across the application bridge.  He assists the reader in developing the textual and sermon ideas and relating these to the audience by means of an interrogative that is answered by means of the predicates which will serve as the divisions of the sermon.

The next two chapters are concerned with properly organizing one’s thought for the sermon.  McDill offers an exercise for clarifying the transition statements which will serve to bind the sermon together while also moving its argument along.  McDill suggests that the form of the sermon should consider the text’s form but not necessarily be constrained by it.  Instead he suggests that Alan Monroe’s motivated sequence outline be used as a template for insuring the communication value of sermons.

The next three chapters deal with finishing the sermon so that its thought will be easily understood by the audience.  McDill proposes that each division of the sermon undergo careful development of its “explanation, illustration,  argumentation, and application” (197), and that natural analogies be brought out that will enable the listener to understand that the truth of Scripture is like some particular from his own life experience which he both understands and to which he can relate.  This section is closed with a discussion of how the preacher can use figurative language and stories to drive his point home in the heart of his audience.

The last chapter reminds the preacher that he is preaching for the purpose of eliciting a faith response from the listener. Particularly helpful in this chapter is McDill’s reminder that the preacher must not use words like ought or should, but must boldly proclaim, “Because of all we have said about God, ‘You can’” (255).  The entire process will fail if the preacher faithfully prepares the sermon but does not seek to cause those who listen to him to be convinced of the rightness of God’s cause and the need of everyone to place their own lives before Him.   The principle strength of this book is the practical step-by-step approach employed by McDill.  He does not loose his reader in discussion of Greek tenses or hermeneutical minutia but instead supplies a simple, clear approach to preaching.  For example, his discussion of the distinction between biblical hermeneutics and other interpretative exercises is wonderfully simple.  He states that three reasons that distinguish biblical interpretation from that of other things are: “the Bible is old . . .the Bible is fixed and stable as a written document . . . [and] the Bible . . . is about God and his dealings with mankind” (60-61).

Another strength is the clarity with which McDill presents his discussion of the textual and sermon ideas.  His treatment is simple and effective. He shows his reader how to bridge the gap between the author’s intended meaning and the sermon idea by way of an example based on the story of the fall of man in the garden of Eden (126).  In this example he shows how other Scripture can be used to limit the author’s idea and that the goal of the sermon is to present the timeless principle to a contemporary audience.

A weakness is the false distinction which McDill raises between inductive and deductive study.  His claim is that those who practice deductive study bring their own or another’s ideas to the text while those who study the text inductively are guilty of bringing presuppositions to the text. He states, “If [one] examines the text inductively . . . [one] suspends [one’s] own conclusions to let it speak, opening the way for the Spirit to disclose its meaning” (24).  This is an overstatement of his argument because the inductive method cannot in and of itself prevent one from bringing presuppositions to the text, nor can it be stated that the deductive method necessitates one bring presuppositions to the text.  Taken to its extreme this line of reasoning could be used to justify all manner of eiseigesis.  Many well-meaning Christians read the texts of Scripture and, waiting for the Spirit to tell them what it means, are lead astray by false teaching.  J. I. Packer points out that one danger of inductive study is “that [it] tells you to ‘observe’ without giving you any theological orientation to help you do it.”

Another weakness is McDill’s incorrect assumption that delivery of the sermon is not a “critical factor in what we recognize as great preaching” (10).  Many well-reasoned, clear arguments have been lost by the lack of pathos of the speaker.  Preaching involves persuasion, and if one will be successful in causing his audience to accept his position, one must prepare and concentrate both on the logic of his argument and on the methods of the delivery of his argument.

Yet another weakness is McDill’s proposition that Alan Monroe’s motivated sequence be utilized as the rubric through which all sermon forms must pass.  While McDill’s premise is sound in preaching from didactic texts and communicating truths to an audience, he has not engaged those who propose a narrative style of preaching.  To be fair, however, to engage the narrative preaching movement would be beyond the stated scope of this book (15).

The simple but thorough process described by McDill will assist anyone who reads this text.  In particular, this book would be excellent for bi-vocational preachers who will be unable to attend seminary or for those whose preaching has become dull and lifeless.  With so many books on preaching being written as surveys of various sermonic forms McDill has performed a service for those who seek to learn how to simply write a clear and effective sermon.

End Notes

1. Mcdill Wayne, The 12 Essential Skills For Great Preaching. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1994.

Posted in Book Reviews, Preaching - Tagged Biblical Truth, Church Growth, Preaching

Religion Can Get In the Way Of Your Own Salvation Part 2

Apr26
2012
Written by Warner Smith

If you have always gone to church you could have trouble accepting the truth that you need a spiritual rebirth.  According to Jesus’ teaching everyone “must be born again.”

We all need to be twice born.  Once “from above,” or a supernatural rebirth.

Christianity at its very core, is about our each having a supernatural rebirth. This rebirth can only be accomplished through a genuine work of God.  God alone can make it happen. This second birth can only be received by faith, and if God does not make it happen after you receive it by faith then it will never happen. Why? Because you and I do not have the ability within ourselves to make it happen. This makes us feel helpless, but the truth is only God can make it happen. All you can do is throw yourself upon His mercy and cry out for His grace.

But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.     John 1:12-13

In Greek, the word translated “right,”is  (εξουσίαν) exousia. It means the right or freedom of choice, authority, and ability or power.  It means all three of those things. You and I have the God given right or freedom to choose to receive Him.  We have His authority to choose to receive Him for ourselves, and He has given us the ability to make the choice to receive Him. God has given us the right, the authority, and the power to become children of God.  He gives this right, authority and power to everyone who will believe in His name.

We are not born into God’s kingdom through any natural process.  Our blood does not qualify us, nor our ancestry, only God can initiate this second birth.  People tell me very often that their parents were great Christians, and they somehow assume that their parents faith passed to them genetically.

Unfortunately this is not the case.  Mom and Dad passed down to you a sinful nature known as depravity. They needed to be born again just as you I need to be born again.  God has to work the miracle of salvation deep within you through His Spirit or it will not happen.

A true spiritual rebirth will not occur through religion. It will only happen through a life changing encounter.  You need to know this because you need to tell others that only a life changing encounter with Jesus Christ can forgive sin.  Not only does He forgive your sins, but a genuine rebirth will alter your nature.  Deep within your spirit God will change your inclination to agree with His will forever. You can still sin, but inside your core you will grieve.  You will feel terrible, because God the Holy Spirit will convict you and condemn your sin.

This second birth is a spiritual birth.

5 Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. 6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.    John 3:5–6 (ESV)

Someone recently asked me what being born of the water meant in this text.  The best answer will fit the context of the passage.  This text is an example of Hebrew thought being translated into Greek.  Hebrew often uses parallelism to expand and complete a thought.  Being born of water is to be understood as the parallel for being born of the flesh.  Being born of water or of the flesh parallels being born of the Spirit.  When our mothers water breaks we are born of water, when we exit her womb we are born of the flesh.

The point of this text is to explain the necessity of our being born of the Spirit.  God the Holy Spirit must be the midwife of our being reborn or we will not be truly born again.  While I have the right to choose, God’s Spirit must also be involved.  Many people have walked an aisle, shook hands with their pastor and joined the church, but were not born again.  If God’s Spirit is not involved your nature will not change and sooner or later you will claim that Christianity did not work for you.  The reason for this is that you tried to be born again by your own will in your own power and God’s Spirit was not involved.

This second birth is a spiritual birth or it becomes only an empty religious ritual that has no saving power.

We all “must” be born again or we cannot enter the kingdom of God.

Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘you must be born again,’    John 3:7

In Greek the word translate “must” is dei.  It means a divine necessity. In other words a spiritual rebirth is a divine necessity.  It is nonnegotiable.  You, me and everyone else who has ever or will ever walk the face of this earth must be born again, there are no exceptions.  Jesus did not say:

  • Nicodemus, it’s important for you to be born again, or
  • Nicodemus it will help you to be born again, or
  • Nicodemus you will achieve your spiritual ambition if you add this component of rebirth to you religion.

He said, Nicodemus You Must Be Born Again!  If you are NOT born again you, the CEO of religion in Jerusalem, will not see the kingdom of God.  This concept is at the very heart of Christianity. There is no substitute. You cannot substitute church for this rebirth.  You cannot substitute your parents relationship with Christ for your own.  You will not get a pass because of your denominations understanding of salvation.  You, each and everyone must be born again!

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Biblical Truth, Culture, Evangelism, Manhood, Unchurched

Book Review: Pilgrims In Their Own Land

Apr26
2012
Written by Warner Smith

In Pilgrims in Their Own Land 1 Martin Marty catalogs the history of religion in the United States. Marty traces the pilgrimage of immigrants to American soil while paying close attention to their religious beliefs and practices. After examining each group’s religious beliefs, he then explores the interplay between new beliefs and those that were previously existing. Marty also observes the various new ideas and aberrations which Americans have contributed to religion.

As a professor of the History of Modern Christianity at the University of Chicago and the author of numerous books, Martin Marty is very qualified to write on the subject of religion in America. He views the population of the United States to be on a continuous religious pilgrimage, in which potential religious choices increase with the arrival of each new immigrant. Although Marty seems to conclude that these religious choices will continuously increase, he offers four broad categories under which the history of most religious expression in America may be placed. While these four categories are by no means exhaustive, they provide the necessary handles one requires in order to grasp the rich tapestry of America’s religious identity. These four categories are Protestantism, Catholicism, Judaism, and secular humanism.

The major player in the religious history of America is Protestantism. The profound and lasting influence the Puritans have had on all those who have followed is difficult to overstate. While American Protestants have all acknowledged a regard for the Holy Scriptures, they have differed widely in practice and their allowance for diversity of viewpoints. This has caused many new sects to form as new opinions have advanced and new practices have gained credence. This fragmentation is exemplified by the Disciples of Christ who, in their search for primitive Christianity, effectively divided the church more by providing yet another choice from which religious pilgrims might choose. There were others who initially sought to return to the primitive roots of Christianity but founded whole new faiths instead which were unrecognizable to orthodox Christians. Among those claiming revelations equal or superior to the Christian scriptures were the Mormons, Adventists, and Christian Scientists. Also, Transcendentalists like Thoreau and Emerson who sought to simplify religion created their own (262).

Throughout his book Marty conveys two themes regarding American Protestantism. First, he shows how Protestantism has been dominant in shaping religious thought since the beginning of the United States. Second, he reveals how American Protestantism has constantly been required to reevaluate itself as it has been forced to deal with the new notions of immigrants from without and innovators from within American society. According to Marty, America has said, in effect, to immigrants, “Well, we guess you are going to stay and we guess you are more or less welcome — but you have to change” (271).

While continual fragmentation of American Protestantism has made it hard to follow each variant, three general trends can be discerned. First, American Evangelical beliefs have remained remarkably close to their Puritan forefathers. Second, liberal theologies within mainline Protestantism have produced a type of religious expression that, from time to time, is not only different from its ancestor but openly hostile to it. Third, American Protestantism has produced a wide panoply of cults whose claims have led many away from Christian faith and practice.

The second broad category of American religious history is Catholicism. Catholicism was the first form of Christianity to be introduced on American soil. After Columbus and the Conquistadores came Jesuits who were genuinely interested in the salvation of the native Americans. Due to political differences and competition between the Spanish and French Catholics, an adequate window of opportunity was created which English Protestants seized. Because of these events, with the exception of pockets of missionary activity in the American southwest Catholic influences had to await the immigrants of the eighteenth century to gain a significant foothold in American religious thought. This foothold grew, and by the twentieth century Catholicism could boast of having elected one of their own as President of the United States. From after, Vatican II relations with the old established sects of Protestantism continued to improve. In 1958 Jacques Martian offered a revealing look at the religious landscape of America which apparently significantly affected the author giving him one of his major themes. Martian wrote “Americans seem to be in their own land as pilgrims, prodded by a dream. They are always on the move . . . , not settled, installed” (431).

The third broad category of American religious history is Judaism. Having been practiced in America since colonial times, American Jews have enjoyed a tolerance previously unknown among the nations of the world. With one exception in 1658 America, Marty records that no Jewish believer has had to stand trial for blasphemy (84). In fact, America’s tolerance fostered the atmosphere in which Isaac Mayer Wise and his Reform party of Judaism could speak of “the American way” (288), stifling for some time visions of Jewish Zionism among American Jews. Wise’s message, nurtured by his optimism in America was that “Reform Judaism was not just a faith for Jews but was the faith for moderns, the fulfillment for Americans” (290).

The fourth broad category of American religious history is secular humanism. The beginnings of secular humanism can be traced to the founding father’s desire to create a religion from the state. Prior to the constitution’s ratification, “Benjamin Franklin called for a ‘public religion,’” (154). This religion denied the divinity of Christ while agreeing with the moral code that Jesus advanced (157). George Washington, through his ambiguous statements about religion, also further advanced the idea of a secular religion (158). This public religion became rooted in America’s legal, educational, and political systems. This new secular, or public religion, had “Its creed in the Declaration (of Independence), its prophecies in the most compelling lines of presidential addresses, its psalms in some American poetry” (165). Marty writes that by eighteen hundred this secular religion was strong enough that it was a rival to the traditional church (169). Prior to the War Between the States in 1838, Abraham Lincoln was able to clearly articulate what Franklin had earlier voiced. Lincoln said that “reverence for laws must produce ‘the political religion of the nation,’ and this religion . . . should call forth unceasing sacrifice on its altar” (222). This strain of secularism found a strong advocate in the theories of Darwin which, when combined with the shift away from biblical Christianity within the academy, provided another secular voice with which the churches must vie.

Several apparent biases appear throughout this book. As Marty attempts to explain Queen Isabella’s of Spain inner war, he lists revulsion for the “cocksureness, even fanaticism with which believers felt that God chartered their version of faith as being alone the pure and true one” (16).

Another example of bias is evident in Marty’s discussion of the Great Awakening. Marty is not certain that there was a significant declension preceding the revivals (108). Furthermore, he engages in the historians’ fallacy of insinuating motivation to the revivalists during this awakening. He writes that “to get the revival off the ground, the pioneers . . . had to demonstrate a need in the colonies. Never trust a revivalist preacher for a fully accurate picture of how bad the times were spiritually” (109). Not only does Marty have a bias against the revivalists’ trustworthiness in accurately portraying the times preceding the revival, he also implies that there possibly were problems with Edwards’ motivation in four areas of this revival. First, Marty implies that Edwards studied crowd psychology in the conversions occurring in other towns (114), possibly suggesting causation in the revival of Northampton. Second, he attributes an impure motive to Edwards’ in rewriting history with Northampton as its climax for the purpose of increasing the peoples’ reaction to the revival. Third, Marty states that Edwards placed the “Made in America” stamp on the revival even though he knew there were similar revivals breaking out on the European continent (115). Fourth, Marty’s bias against Edwards is further revealed in his description of Edwards’ book on the revival as “six quaint pages in a book rarely read about an awakening most Americans never heard of” (116).

Again evidence of an anti-evangelical bias by Marty is revealed when he writes that George Whitfield, following his conversion, engaged in “spreading the charge revivalists like to make: that one may go to church and say prayers but still not be a Christian without a specific experience” (118).

Yet another example of bias on Marty’s part is apparent when, in his discussion of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary professor Crawford H. Toy, he writes that “Toy unfortunately had to test his ideas . . . in the Southern Baptist Convention”(304). Toy agreed with the new theory which German scholars taught: that when studying the Scripture, “the kernel of truth” must be separated “from its outer covering of myth” (305). These views were discussed within the Southern Baptist Convention leading Toy to resign.

A more remarkable occurrence of bias is Marty’s statement that Mary Baker Eddy’s Christian Science movement “was one of the most impressive visions and achievements on the American spiritual landscape” (331). Once more Marty shows his liberal bias over and against current conservative views when he counts as one of the most vital signs of mainline church strengthening “the efforts to break two-thousand-year-old patterns of male dominance in religion” (438).

Overall, this is a helpful edition which provides a thorough treatment of the diverse religious background of America’s people. Marty’s treatment is, in the main, as balanced as modern evangelicals may expect from any but their own writers. There is a rich collection of historic information contained in this volume which makes it profitable for anyone seeking to begin to gain an understanding of America’s religious heritage.

End Notes

1. Marty, Martin. Pilgrims in Their Own Land. New York: Penguin Books, 1984. 488 pp.

Posted in Book Reviews, Revival - Tagged Biblical Truth, Culture, Evangelism, Puritans, Revival, worldview

The Apostle Paul Would Not Recognize Most Of American Christianity

Apr21
2012
Written by Warner Smith

A friend of mine who does research for a living told me of a conversation he recently had with a professional pollster.  The pollster knew that my friend was a Southern Baptist.  He told him that his company had developed a new strategy for checking the margin of error in results which also doubled for doing a poll immediately when clients wanted an instant result.  The method was to gather 15 Southern Baptists and ask them their opinions. The reason they can depend on such a shortcut in their research he explained was that the “Southern Baptist Church has the purest picture of America in the streets.”

This statement was not meant to be a compliment.  We have changed what the people in church believe but not how they live.  We have taught them to know better but not to do better.  This state of affairs explains why individual Christians can make statements like, “I know that this is not right but . . .”.  Think about how often you behave in a way contrary to your stated beliefs.  How quickly do you discount what you know to be right for a course of action that is either more convenient or more desirable?

Paul had discovered the true value of knowing Christ and it so changed his behavior that he could write:

8 . . . I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ.    Philippians 3:8 (ESV)

Saul (who later became known as the Apostle Paul) was educated at the Harvard of his country.

3 “I am a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city, educated under Gamaliel, strictly according to the law of our fathers, being zealous for God just as you all are today. Acts 22:3 (NASB)

While no one can know for certain, it is reasonable to assume that prior to being knocked off his horse by Christ while on the Damascus road (and converted), Paul was well off and married.

All Pharisees were married as a matter of custom.  They did not think that one who was not married had either the social status within their community or the accumulated wisdom to teach others.  Although a Jew, Paul was also a Roman citizen.  His Roman citizenship provides us another clue to both Paul’s social standing and wealth.  Roman citizenship was purchased only at a very high price.  Either Paul or his family would have had to have purchased his citizenship.

When Paul says “I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord” we need to realize that his relationship with Christ really had cost him plenty.

23 Are they servants of Christ? . . . I more so; in far more labors, in far more imprisonments, beaten times without number, often in danger of death.  24 Five times I received from the Jews thirty-nine lashes.  25 Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, a night and a day I have spent in the deep.  26 I have been on frequent journeys, in dangers from rivers, dangers from robbers, dangers from my countrymen, dangers from the Gentiles, dangers in the city, dangers in the wilderness, dangers on the sea, dangers among false brethren;  27 I have been in labor and hardship, through many sleepless nights, in hunger and thirst, often without food, in cold and exposure.  28 Apart from such external things, there is the daily pressure on me of concern for all the churches.                               2 Corinthians 11:23–28 (NASB)

Paul clearly placed knowing and obeying Christ above everything else in his life.  What are you willing to loose because you so value “the surpassing worth of knowing Christ?”  Some people mistakenly want to know Jesus without losing anything.  Southern Baptist’s whose lifestyle is so like American culture that pollsters can describe them as the “purest picture of the American street” are practicing a form of Christianity which would be unrecognizable to the Apostle Paul.  Today’s American Christian so values pursuing the American dream that he is unable or unwilling to be inconvenienced in order to gain Christ.

Think about your own lifestyle.  What have you lost and what are you willing to loose to in your pursuit of Christ?

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Christian Maturity, Culture, Manhood

40 Days of Preparation Day 33

Mar28
2012
Leave a Comment Written by Warner Smith

Today, Wednesday March 28, 2012, is the thirty-third day of preparing our hearts, souls and minds for the most high of all Christian holy days, Easter Sunday. Today I need to “put off” being inhospitable and “put on” hospitality. I know it may be hard for some to believe, but one of the most hospitable places on earth is the middle east. Those who travel there speak of the wonderful hospitality which they experienced while traveling and meeting those people who inhabit these sometime inhospitable lands. In America those of us who live in th south have taken pride in “southern hospitality.”

The biblical culture valued hospitality and severely punished those who were inhospitable. In the Old Testament the Ammonites and the Moabites, were cursed to the tenth generation for having been inhospitable to the nation of Israel when they came to the promised land, although they were distant relations.

3 “No Ammonite or Moabite may enter the assembly of the Lord. Even to the tenth generation, none of them may enter the assembly of the Lord forever, 4 because they did not meet you with bread and with water on the way, when you came out of Egypt, and because they hired against you Balaam the son of Beor from Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse you. 5 But the Lord your God would not listen to Balaam; instead the Lord your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the Lord your God loved you. 6 You shall not seek their peace or their prosperity all your days forever. Deuteronomy 23:3–6 (ESV)

It is important for the authentic practice of our Christianity that you and I “put off” being inhospitable and “put on” hospitality. It is with the seriousness of this cultural value for practicing hospitality that Peter’s admonishes Christians to practice hospitality to one another.

8 Above all, keep loving one another earnestly, since love covers a multitude of sins. 9 Show hospitality to one another without grumbling. 10 As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God’s varied grace: 1 Peter 4:8–10 (ESV)

We are not to grumble as we are hospitable but are to genuinely care for the comfort and support of each other. It is about this attitude of being exuberant as we practice hospitality that Paul speaks to the Romans.

9 Let love be genuine. Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is good. 10 Love one another with brotherly affection. Outdo one another in showing honor. 11 Do not be slothful in zeal, be fervent in spirit, serve the Lord. 12 Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer. 13 Contribute to the needs of the saints and seek to show hospitality. Romans 12:9–13 (ESV)

At the risk of alienating you I want to share my observation that in America today we are becoming more and more inhospitable.  In the biblical world being hospitable related to two distinct classes of people: the traveler and the resident alien.

In the original biblical languages these words are sometimes used interchangeably. A stranger, foreigner, alien, sojourner, wayfarer, or gentile are those who do not belong to a particular community or group. In Israel, the law protected the resident alien, a foreigner who had settled permanently in the land. While he could not own land, he could participate in communal activities. The traveler, however, was extremely vulnerable and depended solely upon the hospitality of strangers.

We need to consider Peter and Paul’s admonitions toward our practicing hospitality and our attitudes toward the transients and illegal aliens who live in or pass through our communities today. We may not have invited them but our genuine acts of hospitality could be used by the Holy Spirit to lead them to faith in Jesus.

One thing is certain our being inhospitable to them, or making disingenuous attempts at being hospitable will not positively impact them for Christ.  You and I need to “put off” being inhospitable and “put on” hospitality toward one another, and the transients and illegals in our society.

Posted in Daily Devotions - Tagged Biblical Truth, Christian Maturity, Culture, Easter, Evangelism, family, Jesus, Marriage and Family, Stewardship, worldview
← Older Entries

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bearings Class
  • Book Reviews
  • Daily Devotions
  • Ministry Thoughts
  • Nehemiah and Mark Bible Studies
  • Podcasts
  • Preaching
  • Puritans
  • Revival
  • The Huddle
  • The Persecuted Church
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


 Subscribe in a reader

Recent Comments

  • joeyfaulk on 40 Days of Preparation Day 17
  • Brenda Hagan on 40 Days of Preparation Day 17
  • Carole Earwood on In Search of Biblical Revival, The Need for Revival Part 2
  • Chris Bevil on Hidden Worldviews, Why Do You Believe What You Believe?
  • Brenda Hagan on A Man and His Daughters

Nehemiah and Mark Studies

The Mark Bible Study The Nehemiah Bible Study

Recent Publications

2010 Church Consulting Future Trends Report

Blogroll

  • Lifeway Research
  • TED: Ideas worth spreading
  • The Long View

Ministry Resources

  • Church Planting Movements
  • David Mays's Booknotes
  • Faith in Action
  • Great Commission Initiative
  • IMB Global Research
  • Mission to Unreached Peoples
  • People Groups
  • Voice of the Martyr's

Pastor Resources

  • MAPChurch

Staff Blogs

  • Joey Faulk

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009

EvoLve theme by Theme4Press  •  Powered by WordPress Warner Smith